Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 3943 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 17 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 93% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron 847 - 247 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 24 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Core i9-12900KS
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
