Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 2766 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 33% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 863 vs 649 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 85 vs 150 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i9-12900KS
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900KS | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 5th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 150 W | TDP | 85 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
