Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 2320 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 35 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 17% better in Resident Evil 4 than Celeron 1000M - 178 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 12 vs 2 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Celeron 1000M
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon E |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
