Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2495 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 26% better in War Thunder than Celeron 1000M - 155 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 4 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Celeron 1000M
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 35 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
