Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is 2269 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Performs up to 3% better in Stray than Celeron 1000M - 180 vs 174 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Celeron 1000M - 15 vs 35 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 8 vs 2 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron 1000M
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
