Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is 2787 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
- Performs up to 4% better in Dishonored 2 than Core i3-4160T - 271 vs 261 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 48 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
271
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2065
100%
Multi-Core
14738
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
| Chagall | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 280 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
