Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is 3235 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
- Performs up to 29% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i7-4800MQ - 90 vs 70 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 48 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Consumes up to 83% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX - 47 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
90
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2065
100%
Multi-Core
14738
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Chagall | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 47 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
