Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is 839 days newer than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
- Performs up to 11% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Athlon 3000G - 178 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 48 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2065
100%
Multi-Core
14738
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Athlon |
| Chagall | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 280 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
