Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is 2738 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
- Performs up to 13% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 320 vs 284 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 48 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX - 105 vs 280 Watts
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
320
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2065
100%
Multi-Core
14738
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Chagall | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
24 | Cores | 10 |
48 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 105 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
