Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is 2185 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-4160T - 209 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
209
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1659
100%
Multi-Core
10709
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 280 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
