Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is 2136 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
- Performs up to 10% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 366 vs 334 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX - 135 vs 280 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
366
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1659
100%
Multi-Core
10709
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 135 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
