Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is 237 days newer than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Athlon 3000G - 191 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1659
100%
Multi-Core
10709
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Athlon |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 280 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
