Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is 2633 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
- Performs up to 8% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Core i7-4800MQ - 146 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Consumes up to 83% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX - 47 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
146
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1659
100%
Multi-Core
10709
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 47 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
