Buy on Amazon
$49
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1799
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is 2079 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Performs up to 5% better in Deathloop than Celeron G1620 - 175 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 64 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 55 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1620 2.7 1 LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1620
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
34.66101694915254%
Multi-Core
723
10.012463647694226%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 13th, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
| Colfax | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 250 W | TDP | 55 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
