Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1240 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 64 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 11% better in Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 61 vs 55 FPS
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - $79.99 vs $2698.95
- Up to 97% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - $1.31 vs $49.07 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
FPS
55
90%
Value, $/FPS
$49.07/FPS
2%
Price, $
$2698.95
2%
Buy for $2,698.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4149 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
61
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $79.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 13th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Colfax | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
250 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |