Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is 2177 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Performs up to 5% better in Deathloop than FX-4130 - 175 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 125 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $52.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Aug 13th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
Colfax | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
250 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |