Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 464 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 29% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-7900X - $1.23 vs $1.74 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-7900X - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 187 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $325.0 vs $398.88
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
183
97.86096256684492%
Value, $/FPS
$1.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$398.88
81%
Value Winner
Buy for $398.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
187
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.74/FPS
70.6896551724138%
Price, $
$325
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for $325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
89.59212376933895%
Multi-Core
7454
84.88782598792848%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |