Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-14400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-14400F is 2387 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 15% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-7900X - 150 vs 131 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - $209.99 vs $412.83
- Up to 56% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-7900X - $1.4 vs $3.15 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $412.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4018 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
150
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$209.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4017 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7900X | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |