Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 734 days older than the cheaper Core i5-14400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - $209.99 vs $458.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-12900 - $0.86 vs $1.8 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 4% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-14400F - 255 vs 245 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
245
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$209.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12691 minutes ago
Buy for $458 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12692 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |