Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 1554 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $225.1 vs $295.89
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 17% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 151 vs 129 FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
129
85.43046357615894%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$225.1
100%
Buy for $225.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
Buy for $295.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
47.87673806839534%
Multi-Core
7454
48.16801292407108%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |