Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 16% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-10700K - 130 vs 112 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $230.0 vs $1399.99
- Up to 81% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-13700F - $2.05 vs $10.77 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.77/FPS
19%
Price, $
$1399.99
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12182 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
112
86%
Value, $/FPS
$2.05/FPS
100%
Price, $
$230
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $230 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700F | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |