Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700K is 1039 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i9-7900X - 246 vs 242 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - $230.0 vs $412.83
- Up to 46% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-7900X - $0.93 vs $1.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700K - 20 vs 16 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
246
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
Price, $
$230
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $230 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4057 minutes ago
Buy for $412.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4057 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |