Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 569 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 4% better in Sons Of The Forest than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 105 vs 101 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $150.0 vs $197.65
- Up to 27% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $1.43 vs $1.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7883 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
105
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7882 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Colfax | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |