Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900HX outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900HX is 2962 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
- Performs up to 18% better in Remnant II than Celeron G1610 - 92 vs 78 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 45 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 12th, 2021
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Celeron |
Cezanne | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |