Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900H outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900H is 2513 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
- Performs up to 29% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-6350 - 576 vs 448 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1297 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 16th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Renoir | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |