Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900H outperforms Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900H is 433 days newer than Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Core i5-9400F - 153 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1716 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 16th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Renoir | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |