Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 277 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 48% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $98.75 vs $188.95
- Up to 46% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.81 vs $1.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen 5 3400G - 125 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 24 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
122
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.51/FPS
53%
Price, $
$188.95
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for $188.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |