Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 277 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $100.99 vs $750.0
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 24 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $100.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76365 minutes ago
Buy for $750 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76365 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1128
88.54003139717426%
Multi-Core
3619
48.55111349610947%
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |