Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the more expensive Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 3444 days newer than the more expensive Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 260% better in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than Phenom X4 9550 - 90 vs 25 FPS
- Up to 42% cheaper than Phenom X4 9550 - $109.99 vs $189.95
- Up to 84% better value when playing Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than Phenom X4 9550 - $1.22 vs $7.6 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 16 vs 4 threads
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
90
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Agena | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |