Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the more expensive Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 4417 days newer than the more expensive Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 281% better in Immortals of Aveum than Phenom X4 9550 - 61 vs 16 FPS
- Up to 39% cheaper than Phenom X4 9550 - $115.99 vs $189.95
- Up to 84% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Phenom X4 9550 - $1.9 vs $11.87 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 12 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
16
26.229508196721312%
Value, $/FPS
$11.87/FPS
16.006739679865206%
Price, $
$189.95
61%
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
61
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.9/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $115.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
13.87900355871886%
Multi-Core
712
10.441413697023023%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Agena | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |