Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600KF outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600KF is 5682 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-14600KF - $189.95 vs $294.99
- Up to 13% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-14600KF - $1.24 vs $1.42 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600KF
- Performs up to 36% better in No Man's Sky than Phenom X4 9550 - 208 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 20 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
153
73%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4457 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
87%
Price, $
$294.99
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for $294.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4456 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i5-14600KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Agena | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |