Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 4417 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $189.95 vs $209.65
- Up to 4% better value when playing Stray than Core i7-10700KF - $1.09 vs $1.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Stray than Phenom X4 9550 - 186 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 16 vs 4 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
174
93%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
186
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
96%
Price, $
$209.65
90%
FPS Winner
Buy for $209.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Agena | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |