Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the more expensive Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 4119 days newer than the more expensive Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 19% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Phenom X4 9550 - 102 vs 86 FPS
- Up to 34% cheaper than Phenom X4 9550 - $124.79 vs $189.95
- Up to 45% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Phenom X4 9550 - $1.22 vs $2.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 8 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
86
84.31372549019608%
Value, $/FPS
$2.21/FPS
55.203619909502265%
Price, $
$189.95
65%
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
102
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$124.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $124.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
20.74468085106383%
Multi-Core
712
19.6739430781984%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Agena | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |