Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 5031 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $189.95 vs $899.99
- Up to 73% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-12400F - $0.84 vs $3.12 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 27% better in Ready or Not than Phenom X4 9550 - 288 vs 226 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 12 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
226
78%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.12/FPS
26%
Price, $
$899.99
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Agena | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |