Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-8320 outperforms the more expensive Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-8320 is 1671 days newer than the more expensive Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Performs up to 10% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Phenom X4 9550 - 88 vs 80 FPS
- Up to 50% cheaper than Phenom X4 9550 - $95.0 vs $189.95
- Up to 54% better value when playing Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Phenom X4 9550 - $1.08 vs $2.37 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 8 vs 4 threads
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
80
90.9090909090909%
Value, $/FPS
$2.37/FPS
45.56962025316456%
Price, $
$189.95
50%
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
50.98039215686274%
Multi-Core
712
39.14238592633315%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | FX |
Agena | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |