Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-6350 outperforms the more expensive Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-6350 is 1859 days newer than the more expensive Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 3% better in Apex Legends than Phenom X4 9550 - 257 vs 249 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than Phenom X4 9550 - $100.0 vs $189.95
- Up to 49% better value when playing Apex Legends than Phenom X4 9550 - $0.39 vs $0.76 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 6 vs 4 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
257
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | FX |
Agena | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |