Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 1336 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 6% better in Dirt 5 than Phenom II X4 830 - 141 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 6 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
141
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2309 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | FX |
Deneb | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |