Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 4214 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 17% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Phenom II X4 830 - 132 vs 113 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2598 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i3 |
Deneb | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |