Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4350 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4350 is 932 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i3-4350 - $39.99 vs $51.6
- Up to 18% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-4350 - $0.28 vs $0.34 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4350 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4350
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 2042 than FX-8120 - 152 vs 143 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15336 minutes ago
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15336 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Core i3-4350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |