Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 1443 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 56% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600X - $55.0 vs $125.0
- Up to 54% better value when playing Fortnite than Ryzen 5 1600X - $0.26 vs $0.56 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 4% better in Fortnite than FX-6350 - 222 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
Buy for $125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |