Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7400T outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7400T is 1533 days newer than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 4% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-6300 - 285 vs 274 FPS
- Up to 30% cheaper than FX-6300 - $52.0 vs $74.04
- Up to 33% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-6300 - $0.18 vs $0.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1124 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
285
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1126 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |