Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1533 days newer than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 2% better in Ready or Not than FX-6300 - 238 vs 234 FPS
- Up to 33% cheaper than FX-6300 - $39.0 vs $58.02
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $58.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74641 minutes ago
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74640 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |