Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 565 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 1% better in Halo Infinite than FX-6100 - 152 vs 151 FPS
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
152
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-6100 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |