Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1693 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i7-6800K - $29.65 vs $90.0
- Up to 58% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-6800K - $0.69 vs $1.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 28% better in Starfield than FX-6100 - 55 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
43
78.18181818181819%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$29.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $29.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4862 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
42.073170731707314%
Price, $
$90
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4865 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |