Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms Radeon 680M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 2686 days older than Radeon 680M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon 680M
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 50 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 25% better in World of Tanks than Radeon 680M - 161 vs 129 FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon 680M
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Radeon 680M
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
41%
AMD Radeon 680M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| Navi II IGP | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | HBM |
| System-Shared | Bus | 4096-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
2000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 2200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
