Key Differences
In short — Radeon 680M outperforms Radeon R7 250E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon 680M is 3301 days newer than Radeon R7 250E.
Advantages of AMD Radeon 680M
- Performs up to 29% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Radeon R7 250E - 45 vs 35 FPS
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 250E - 50 vs 55 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Radeon 680M
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Radeon R7 250E
Desktop • Dec 20th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Radeon 680M
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon 680M | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250E |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Dec 20th, 2013 |
| Navi II IGP | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 1 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 72 GB/s |
2000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 800 MHz |
| 2200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
