Key Differences
In short — Radeon 680M outperforms Radeon R7 260 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon 680M is 3304 days newer than Radeon R7 260.
Advantages of AMD Radeon 680M
- Performs up to 23% better in Sons Of The Forest than Radeon R7 260 - 32 vs 26 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 50 vs 95 Watts
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon 680M
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Radeon R7 260
Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Radeon 680M
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon 680M | vs | AMD Radeon R7 260 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Dec 17th, 2013 |
| Navi II IGP | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
2000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 2200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
