Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 380 outperforms Radeon 680M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 380 is 2756 days older than Radeon 680M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon 680M
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 380 - 50 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 380
- Performs up to 2% better in Far Cry 5 than Radeon 680M - 106 vs 104 FPS
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon 680M
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Radeon R9 380
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Radeon 680M
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
97%
Radeon R9 380
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
31.04 GPixel/s
44%
Texel Fillrate
108.6 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon 680M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
| Navi II IGP | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
2000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 970 MHz |
| 2200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |
