Key Differences
In short — Radeon 680M outperforms Radeon R9 270 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon 680M is 3338 days newer than Radeon R9 270.
Advantages of AMD Radeon 680M
- Performs up to 16% better in God of War than Radeon R9 270 - 37 vs 32 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 270 - 50 vs 150 Watts
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon 680M
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Radeon R9 270
Desktop • Nov 13th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Radeon 680M
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon 680M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Nov 13th, 2013 |
| Navi II IGP | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $179 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
2000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
2200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
