Key Differences
In short — Radeon 680M outperforms Radeon R7 265 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon 680M is 3246 days newer than Radeon R7 265.
Advantages of AMD Radeon 680M
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Radeon R7 265 - 55 vs 48 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 50 vs 150 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Radeon 680M
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon 680M
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon 680M | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
| Navi II IGP | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
2000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
2200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
