Buy on Amazon
€140
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3025 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 27% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Celeron G1610 - 192 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - €72.66 vs €140.0
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Intel® Core™ i5-11600, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 6 core fino a 4,8 GHz LGA1200 (chipset Intel® serie 500 e serie 400 selezionati) 65 W
Buy for €140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74367 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74366 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Core i5-11600
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
20.075400565504243%
Multi-Core
739
9.025403028822668%
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
